HockeyStack Raises $50M to Build Revenue Agents for the Enterprise

What it actually costs to build HockeyStack internally.

Build cost calculator

75

Systems to integrate

Select every system your Revenue Agent would need to read or write to.

    4systems selected
    4

    Dedicated to this project. Not part-time.

    $200,000
    Pilot-ready

    Usable by one team. Works on ~70% of real deals. Requires manual cleanup on the rest.

    Cost to build
    $0

    Before any deal output reaches a rep.

    Ongoing Claude API cost after launch
    $0/year

    Plus ~0.5 FTE engineering to maintain.

    API cost scales with both team size and the number of systems you integrate. More systems = more context per reasoning call = higher per-call token usage.

    WHAT THE CALCULATOR DOESN'T SHOW

    Engineering you haven't scoped yet

    Identity resolution across 12 systems. Event-chain architecture. Multi-layer ML pipeline. Deterministic agent compilation. Feedback loops. Observability. These aren't checklist items. They're the actual product. Most internal builds stop at 'it worked on one deal in a demo.'

    What it takes to keep it working

    Sales process changes. New stage definitions. A CRM field cleanup. A new segment. A product launch. Every one requires prompt updates, test reruns, calibration. The internal build needs a permanent half-headcount of engineering just to not degrade. That engineer gets pulled. Quality degrades. Reps stop trusting it. The tool becomes shelfware by month 9.

    What you can't build in-house

    Cross-customer pattern data. An SLA with your own engineering team. The compounding flywheel of every customer making every other customer better. An internal build is frozen at launch quality. HockeyStack is 3x better 180 days from now. The gap widens.

    Methodology

    The numbers in this calculator come from four sources. Here's where each comes from and the assumptions behind it.

    Input categorySourceKey assumption

    What one reasoning action costs

    At Anthropic list rates for a blended Opus (60%) + Sonnet (40%) workload. This is what an internal build would pay per action โ€” HockeyStack's realized cost is lower through prompt caching, model routing, and enterprise volume contracts.

    ActionInput tokensOutput tokensCost per action

    Assumed action frequency per deal per month โ€” Production tier

    Assumes each rep has ~100 accounts total at production tier: approximately 40 active deals and 60 target accounts. Below shows how often each action fires. Lower tiers assume both fewer accounts per rep and less frequent actions โ€” Pilot-ready is ~80 accounts per rep, Demo is ~60.

    ActionFrequencyPer-deal monthly cost

    At 100 reps with 40 active deals each = 4,000 deals ร— $17.95 = ~$72K/month for deal-level reasoning alone. Prospecting, at 60 target accounts per rep, adds another ~$37K/month. Full production workload approaches $1.3M/year at list rates.

    Not included in the visible number: the opportunity cost of engineers not shipping customer-facing features, typically estimated at 1-2x direct engineering cost.

    All numbers are directional. Your actual build cost depends on team quality, scope discipline, and factors we can't model.

    Stop debating. Start running real numbers.

    Or talk to our solutions team about what your specific build actually looks like.